The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 2 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:
April 2012 - Code a00312 (appeal dismissed):
- Where it’s proposed to erect a two-storey rear extension, the restrictions of A.1(h) would apply to both storeys. (*)
- For example, it is not possible to erect (as a single operation) a two-storey rear extension that has a ground floor that’s closer than 7m to the rear boundary and a first floor that’s not closer than 7m to the rear boundary. (*)
- Where a proposed extension would be attached to another proposed extension, then the phrase “the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse” applies to the combined structure. [Note: In other words, the combined structure should be assessed against those limitations and conditions of Class A that apply to the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse].
- Where a proposed extension would replace an original projection, then the phrase “the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse” does apply to the space that was previously occupied by the original projection. (*)
April 2012 - Code a00311 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
- To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above document for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.