“Part 1 of the GPDO – Appeal Decision Summaries” – 6 additional appeal decisions (total = 368) …

The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 6 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:

November 2012 - Code a00368 (appeal dismissed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a structure that abuts the main house (i.e. without a gap) should be assessed against Class A (i.e. rather than Class E).
  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that significant weight should be attached to the advice within the DCLG “Permitted development rights for householders - Technical Guidance” document. (*)

November 2012 - Code a00367 (appeal allowed):

  • Where a property has a secondary roof that’s slightly lower than the main roof, then an extension on top of this secondary roof should be assessed against Class B (i.e. rather than Class A). (*)
  • For the purposes of the 01/10/2008-05/04/2014 version of B.2(b), where a property has an original rear projection with a side-facing pitched roof, for which the eaves are at a lower level than the eaves of the main rear roof, then B.2(b) would allow a roof extension that extends from the main rear roof onto the side roof of the original rear projection. [Note: The roof extension, for at least part of its width, would extend across the line of the original rear eaves]. (*)
  • Furthermore, the above conclusion still applies even if the ridge-line of the original rear projection is at a (slightly) lower level than the eaves of the main rear roof. [Note: The roof extension, for the whole of its width, would extend across the line of the original rear eaves]. (*)

November 2012 - Code a00366 (appeal dismissed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where the submitted information contained inconsistencies (or similar), and the Inspector concluded that an LDC should be refused on this basis.

November 2012 - Code a00365 (appeal allowed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

November 2012 - Code a00364 (appeal allowed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

November 2012 - Code a00363 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes:

  • To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above document for no extra cost.
  • Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.