“Part 1 of the GPDO – Appeal Decision Summaries” – 5 additional appeal decisions (total = 393) …

The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation (0 "LDC Appeals" and 5 "Enforcement Appeals"), for which the conclusions are as follows:

February 2013 - Code e2013-005 (ground (c) dismissed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that an article 4 direction, which removes permitted development rights under a previous version of the GPDO but doesn’t refer to subsequent versions of the GPDO, does remove permitted development rights under the current version of the GPDO.

February 2013 - Code e2013-004 (ground (c) dismissed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that works involving a slight excess beyond one of the limitations or conditions would not be permitted development (i.e. the Inspector didn’t refer to the excess as “de minimis”). (*)
  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that grey slates (on the face and cheeks of a rear dormer) would not be “of a similar appearance” to red clay tiles (on the roof of the main house).

June 2012 - Code e2012-011 (ground (c) dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

May 2012 - Code e2012-010 (ground (c) dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

May 2012 - Code e2012-009 (ground (c) dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes:

  • To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above document for no extra cost.
  • Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.