The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation (0 "LDC Appeals" and 5 "Enforcement Appeals"), for which the conclusions are as follows:
November 2012 - Code e2012-028 (ground (c) dismissed):
- This appeal decision provides an example of the types of factors that should be taken into consideration when determining which elevation is “the principal elevation”.
- E.1(c) not only prevents an outbuilding from being directly in front of the principal elevation, but also prevents an outbuilding from being in front of the imaginary line of the principal elevation when extended to either side.
November 2012 - Code e2012-027 (ground (c) dismissed):
- This appeal decision provides an example of where the works are on land that’s shared between neighbouring properties (or similar), and the Inspector concluded that the works do not constitute development within “the curtilage of [a / the] dwellinghouse”.
November 2012 - Code e2012-026 (ground (c) allowed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
November 2012 - Code e2012-025 (ground (c) dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
November 2012 - Code e2012-024 (ground (c) dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
Notes:
- To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.