The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 4 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation (2 "LDC Appeals" and 2 "Enforcement Appeals"), for which the conclusions are as follows:
April 2013 - Code a00384 (appeal dismissed):
- This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a Class A extension with a roof that would join onto the roof of the main house should also be assessed against Class B, albeit as well as Class C (without applying the 15cm projection limit of C.1(b)). (*)
April 2013 - Code a00383 (appeal allowed):
- This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a particular piece of land is within the “curtilage” of the property.
December 2012 - Code e2012-034 (ground (c) dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
December 2012 - Code e2012-033 (ground (c) dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
Notes:
- To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.