The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation (3 "LDC Appeals" and 2 "Enforcement Appeals"), for which the conclusions are as follows:
July 2013 - Code a00396 (appeal dismissed):
- More than one wall facing the same direction can form “the rear wall” (in the case where the elevation is staggered horizontally). (*)
- In the above diagrams, “Extension F” would be subject to the “extend beyond” type restrictions in relation to “Wall 1” and “Wall 2”. [Note: The diagrams are viewable within the “Extend beyond” topic of this document].
July 2013 - Code a00395 (appeal allowed):
- No conclusions.
July 2013 - Code a00394 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
July 2013 - Code e2013-014 (ground (c) dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
July 2013 - Code e2013-013 (ground (c) dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
Notes:
- To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above document for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.