The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 4 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation (3 "LDC Appeals" and 1 "Enforcement Appeal"), for which the conclusions are as follows:

October 2013 - Code a00412 (appeal dismissed):

• Where the roof of the extension would have the same angle as, but a different orientation to, the roof of the original house, then this would comply with A.3(c).
• This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the roof pitch of the extension would not be the same as the roof pitch of the original house.
• This appeal decision provides an example of where the Inspector did not accept the applicant’s argument that it wouldn’t be “practicable” for the roof pitch of the extension to be the same as the roof pitch of the original house.

September 2013 - Code e2013-027 (ground (c) dismissed):

• This appeal decision provides an example of the types of factors that should be taken into consideration when determining which elevation is “the principal elevation”.

September 2013 - Code a00411 (appeal allowed):

• [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

September 2013 - Code a00410 (appeal dismissed):

• [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes:

• To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
• Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.