The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document and the Part 1 of the GPDO - PRIOR APPROVAL Appeal Decisions document have been updated to include 6 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation (4 "LDC Appeals", 1 "Enforcement Appeal", and 1 "Prior Approval Appeal"), for which the conclusions are as follows:
"LDC APPEALS" AND "ENFORCEMENT APPEALS":
January 2014 - Code e2014-001 (ground (f) dismissed after considering the fallback position):
- A C4 house in multiple occupation (i.e. a “small HMO”) does benefit from Part 1 of the GPDO. (*)
January 2014 - Code a00446 (appeal allowed):
- Where a proposed extension would be attached to an existing extension, then the phrase “the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse” applies to only the proposed extension. [Note: In other words, only the proposed extension should be assessed against those limitations and conditions of Class A that apply to the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse]. (*)
January 2014 - Code a00445 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
January 2014 - Code a00444:
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
January 2014 - Code a00443:
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
"PRIOR APPROVAL APPEALS":
January 2014 - Code p00037 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
Notes:
- To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document and the Part 1 of the GPDO - PRIOR APPROVAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above documents for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above documents indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.