“GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) – LDC Appeal Decisions” and “GPDO Part 1 Class E (Incidental Requirement) – LDC Appeal Decisions” – 4 additional appeal decisions (total = 571 + 100) …

The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document and the "GPDO Part 1 Class A (Larger Rear Extensions) - Prior Approval Appeal Decisions" document have been updated to include 4 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation (2 "LDC Appeals" and 2 "Enforcement Appeals"), for which the conclusions are as follows:

"LDC APPEALS" AND "ENFORCEMENT APPEALS":

July 2014 - Code a00484 (appeal dismissed):

  • Where a proposed ground floor extension would be on top of a proposed basement extension, then “the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse” does have “more than one storey” / “more than a single storey”.

July 2014 - Code e2014-011 (ground (c) dismissed):

  • Where an existing outbuilding would be enlarged, then the whole of the resulting structure (i.e. not only the additional part) should be assessed against E.1(e). [Note: In other words, the phrase “the building, enclosure or container” applies to the whole of the resulting structure]. (*)
  • For example, where an existing outbuilding is within 2m of a boundary and has height greater than 2.5m, then a proposed extension to this outbuilding would not comply with E.1(e) even if the proposed extension would not (in itself) be within 2m of a boundary or would not (in itself) have height greater than 2.5m. (*)

June 2014 - Code e2014-010 (ground (c) dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

June 2014 - Code a00483 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes: