“GPDO Part 3 Class O – Prior Approval Appeal Decisions” – 9 additional appeal decisions (total = 154) …

The "GPDO Part 3 Class O - Prior Approval Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 9 additional appeal decisions relating to office-to-residential conversions, for which the conclusions are as follows:

February 2016 - Code P3CO-154 (appeal dismissed):

  • This appeal decision was assessed against the issues specified by paragraph O.2 as follows:
    - “transport and highways impacts” = no assessment.
    - “contamination risks” = no assessment.
    - “flooding risks” = no assessment.
  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the lawful use of the site (i.e. the building and any land within its curtilage) is not B1(a). [Note: In other words, the proposed development would not comply with the combination of article 3(5) of the GPDO and the heading of Part 3 Class O].
    [Note: Inspector rejected an application for costs against the Council in relation to this issue].
  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the building was not used as B1(a) on 29/05/2013 or (if not in use on that date) when it was last in use. [Note: In other words, the proposed development would not comply with O.1(b)].
    [Note: Inspector rejected an application for costs against the Council in relation to this issue].

February 2016 - Code P3CO-153 (appeal dismissed):

  • This appeal decision was assessed against the issues specified by paragraph O.2 as follows:
    - “transport and highways impacts” = no assessment.
    - “contamination risks” = no assessment.
    - “flooding risks” = no assessment.
  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the building was not used as B1(a) on 29/05/2013 or (if not in use on that date) when it was last in use. [Note: In other words, the proposed development would not comply with O.1(b)].
    [Note: Inspector rejected an application for costs against the Council in relation to this issue].

February 2016 - Code P3CO-152 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

February 2016 - Code P3CO-151 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

February 2016 - Code P3CO-150 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

February 2016 - Code P3CO-149 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

February 2016 - Code P3CO-148 (appeal allowed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

February 2016 - Code P3CO-147 (appeal allowed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

February 2016 - Code P3CO-146 (appeal allowed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes:

  • To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 3 Class O - Prior Approval Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
  • Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.
  • The above document also includes 28 "Potential fallback position" appeals, which are NOT summarised (only listed).