The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:
February 2016 - Code a00664 (appeal dismissed):
- The phrase “dual-pitched roof” does not apply to an outbuilding with a mansard / crown type roof (i.e. either a roof with shallow pitches in the centre and steeper pitches at the sides, or a roof with a flat area in the centre and pitches at the sides). (*)
February 2016 - Code a00663 (appeal dismissed):
- For the purposes of A.1(b) and E.1(b), a basement extension under the garden does count towards “the total area of ground covered by buildings, enclosure and containers”. [Note: In other words, a basement extension under the garden does use up some (or all) of the 50% limit, even though it’s not on top of the ground].
[Note: Concrete roof of basement is approx 1m below the rear garden]. - This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the development would be contrary to a (general) condition on a previous planning permission. [Note: This conclusion relates to a condition that doesn’t directly remove permitted development rights].
[Note: The condition requires an approved landscaping scheme to be carried out].
February 2016 - Code a00662 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
February 2016 - Code a00661 (appeal allowed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
February 2016 - Code a00660 (appeal allowed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
Notes:
- To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.