The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 6 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:
June 2018 - Code a00948 (appeal allowed):
- The term “eaves” does not apply to the edge of the flat area within a crown roof (i.e. a roof with a flat area in the centre and pitches at the sides).
- Where the original house has a pitched or hipped roof, then it is possible for an extension with a crown roof (i.e. a roof with a flat area in the centre and pitches at the sides) or similar (i.e. a pitched roof with a similar flat area) to comply with A.3(c). (*)
[Note: The extension has a crown roof].
June 2018 - Code a00947 (appeal dismissed):
- An application under section 192 (proposed) should be assessed on the basis of the hypothetical works that are shown on the submitted drawings (i.e. rather than the actual works that have been carried out on the site). (*)
- Where part of an extension is within 2m of a boundary, then the 3m eaves height limit of A.1(i) applies to the entire extension (i.e. not only to that part of the extension that’s within 2m of the boundary). (*)
June 2018 - Code a00946 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
May 2018 - Code a00945 (appeal allowed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
May 2018 - Code a00944 (appeal allowed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
May 2018 - Code a00943 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
Notes:
- To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.