“Part 1 of the GPDO – GENERAL Appeal Decisions” – 6 additional appeal decisions (total = 1,128) …

The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 6 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:

January 2019 - Code a01022 (appeal allowed):

  • The height of a structure should be measured from the highest part of the adjacent ground level (i.e. rather than from each part of the adjacent ground level). (*)
    [Note: The structure is an outbuilding].

January 2019 - Code a01021 (appeal dismissed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a roof slope that’s significantly set back from a forward projection of the property does form part of “the principal elevation”.
    [Note: The roof slope is set back by approx 1.8m].
  • In the second of the above diagrams, “Roof Extension A” does not comply with B.1(c). [Note: The diagrams are viewable within the “Extend beyond” topic of this document].
    [Note: The roof extension does not extend directly rearward onto the corner part of the recessed front roof].

January 2019 - Code a01020 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

January 2019 - Code a01019 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

January 2019 - Code a01018 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

January 2019 - Code a01017 (split decision):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes:

  • To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above document for no extra cost.
  • Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.