The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 2 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:
May 2019 - Code a01053 (appeal dismissed):
- More than one wall facing the same direction can form “the principal elevation” (in the case where the elevation is staggered horizontally). (*)
- More than one roof slope facing the same direction can form “the principal elevation”. (*)
- This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a roof slope that’s significantly set back from a forward projection of the property does form part of “the principal elevation”.
[Note: The roof slope is set back by approx 4.3m].
- In the first of the above diagrams, “Roof Extension A” does not comply with B.1(c). [Note: The diagrams are viewable within the “Extend beyond” topic of this document].
[Note: The roof extension extends directly rearward onto the corner part of the recessed front roof].
May 2019 - Code a01052 (appeal allowed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
- To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.