“GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) – LDC Appeal Decisions” – 5 additional appeal decisions (total = 1,200) …

The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:

November 2019 - Code a01094 (appeal allowed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a structure that’s separated from the main house by a relatively small gap should be assessed against Class E (i.e. rather than Class A). (*)
    [Note: The gap is approx 0.07m (as stated by the Inspector) or 0.035m (as shown by the submitted drawings)].

November 2019 - Code a01093 (appeal allowed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a particular piece of land is within the “curtilage” of the property.
    [Note: The land is approx 17m-29m from the main house].
  • The height of a structure should be measured from the highest part of the adjacent ground level (i.e. rather than from each part of the adjacent ground level). (*)
    [Note: The structure is an outbuilding].

November 2019 - Code a01092 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

November 2019 - Code a01091 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

November 2019 - Code a01090 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes:

  • To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
  • Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.