The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:

November 2019 - Code a01094 (appeal allowed):

• This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a structure that’s separated from the main house by a relatively small gap should be assessed against Class E (i.e. rather than Class A). (*)
  [Note: The gap is approx 0.07m (as stated by the Inspector) or 0.035m (as shown by the submitted drawings)].

November 2019 - Code a01093 (appeal allowed):

• This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a particular piece of land is within the “curtilage” of the property.
  [Note: The land is approx 17m-29m from the main house].
• The height of a structure should be measured from the highest part of the adjacent ground level (i.e. rather than from each part of the adjacent ground level). (*)
  [Note: The structure is an outbuilding].

November 2019 - Code a01092 (appeal dismissed):

• [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

November 2019 - Code a01091 (appeal dismissed):

• [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

November 2019 - Code a01090 (appeal dismissed):

• [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes:

• To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above document for no extra cost.
• Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.