“Part 1 of the GPDO – GENERAL Appeal Decisions” – 5 additional appeal decisions (total = 1,379) …

The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:

February 2021 - Code a01273 (appeal dismissed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a particular piece of land is within the “curtilage” of the property.
    [Note: The land is approx 26m-37m from the main house and separated from the main house by a planting bed].

February 2021 - Code a01272 (appeal allowed):

  • This appeal decision provides an example of where an application was submitted under section 191 (existing) for works that were not begun (or were not substantially complete), and the Inspector concluded that the application should be treated as an application under section 192 (proposed).
    [Note: The works were not begun by the time the application was submitted].
  • This appeal decision provides an example of the types of factors that should be taken into consideration when determining which elevation is “the principal elevation”.
  • “The principal elevation” is not necessarily the elevation that fronts a highway.

January 2021 - Code a01271 (appeal dismissed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

January 2021 - Code a01270 (appeal allowed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

January 2021 - Code a01269 (appeal allowed):

  • [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].

Notes:

  • To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above document for no extra cost.
  • Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.