“Part 1 of the GPDO – GENERAL Appeal Decisions” – 3 additional appeal decisions (total = 1,489) …

The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 3 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:

January 2022 - Code a01383 (appeal dismissed):

  • Whether works are permitted development depends on whether the works comply with the version of the GPDO that was in force on the date the works were begun. (*)
    [Quote: “The appellant correctly identifies that caselaw directs that the date on which the development commenced determines which Statutory Instrument it is to be judged against [footnote: Williams Le Roi v SSE & Salisbury DC [1993] JPL 1033 and R (oao Orange Personal Communication Services Ltd & Others) v Islington LBC [2006] EWCA 157; [2006] JPL 1309]. For the reasons explained below, that is May 2020, when the 2015 GPDO was in force, rather than the Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1988 (1988 GDO), as referred to by the appellant.”].
  • A flat does not benefit from Part 1 of the GPDO.

January 2022 - Code a01382 (split decision):

  • [Note: To view this information, please log onto the website with a current membership.]

January 2022 - Code a01381 (appeal allowed):

  • [Note: To view this information, please log onto the website with a current membership.]

Notes:

  • To view the conclusions, full summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals within the above document for no extra cost.
  • Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.