The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 1 additional appeal decision relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:
March 2023 - Code a01532 (appeal allowed):
- This appeal decision provides an example of where a condition (on a previous planning permission) does not (directly) remove permitted development rights, and the Inspector concluded that the development is not contrary to this condition.
[Note: The condition states “No buildings shall be erected within that part of the residential curtilage created as a result of this  permission.”].
[Quote: “The Local Planning Authority (LPA) correctly states that Condition 3 of the  tennis court permission would restrict any buildings on the land covered by this  application, which it believes includes the [current] appeal site. [...] From the site plan attached to the 1997 application, it appears clear that the ‘red line’ does not include the site of the proposed shed, and condition 3 would not apply to the current LDC application. The appellant has produced an overlay of the site plans of the  planning permission and the current LDC application which demonstrates this. Even though the 1997 plan is roughly drawn at a small scale, the position of the [proposed] shed is clearly sited in the triangular section of land below the area shown for the tennis court.”].
- This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a particular piece of land is within the “curtilage” of the property.
[Note: The land is approx 122m-127m from the main house].
- To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.