The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 2 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:
January 2026 - Code a01900 (appeal dismissed):
- This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the following materials are not “of a similar appearance” to one-another:
- timber cladding versus reddish-brown tiles.
[Note: On the face and cheeks of a side and rear dormer versus on the roof of the main house (respectively)]. - This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the following materials are not “of a similar appearance” to one-another:
- timber cladding versus black mock Tudor boards.
[Note: On the face and cheeks of a side and rear dormer versus on the walls of the main house (respectively)]. - This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the following materials are not “of a similar appearance” to one-another:
- timber cladding versus red bricks.
[Note: On the face and cheeks of a side and rear dormer versus on the walls of the main house (respectively)]. - This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that the following materials are not “of a similar appearance” to one-another:
- timber cladding versus white render.
[Note: On the face and cheeks of a side and rear dormer versus on the walls of the main house (respectively)].
January 2026 - Code a01899 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view this information, please log onto the website with a current membership.]
Notes:
- To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.