Category Archives: Part 3 Class M of the GPDO – Appeal Decisions

“Part 3 of the GPDO – Information about Appeal Decisions” – 6 additional appeal decisions (total = 215) …

The "Part 3 of the GPDO - Information about Appeal Decisions" page has been updated to include 6 additional appeal decisions (1 x Part 3 Class MA, 2 x Part 3 Class PA, 2 x Part 3 Class R, and 1 x Part 3 Class T), which means that the informal lists of prior approval appeals now include the following: Continue reading →

“Part 3 of the GPDO – Information about Appeal Decisions” – 5 additional appeal decisions (total = 209) …

The "Part 3 of the GPDO - Information about Appeal Decisions" page has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions (1 x Part 3 Class C, 2 x Part 3 Class PA, 1 x Part 3 Class R, and 1 x Part 3 Class T), which means that the informal lists of prior approval appeals now include the following: Continue reading →

“Part 3 of the GPDO – Information about Appeal Decisions” – 5 additional appeal decisions (total = 204) …

The Part 3 of the GPDO - Information about Appeal Decisions page has been updated to include 5 additional appeal decisions (1 x Part 3 Class C, 1 x Part 3 Class J, 2 x Part 3 Class PA, and 1 x Part 3 Class R), which means that the informal lists of prior approval appeals now include the following: Continue reading →

High Court judgment relating to article 7 of the GPDO (31/01/2020) …

[UPDATE: For information about the subsequent "Gluck" Court of Appeal judgment dated 21/12/2020, which upheld the below "Gluck" High Court judgment dated 31/01/2020, please view the free-to-view transcript on the Bailii.org website (link).]

Introduction:

The following High Court judgment relating to article 7 of the GPDO (i.e. the provision to agree a "longer period" for an application for prior approval) was handed down on 31/01/2020: Continue reading →

High Court judgment relating to article 7 of the GPDO (31/07/2019) …

[UPDATE: For information about the subsequent "Gluck" High Court judgment dated 31/01/2020, which supports the (opposite) interpretation that LPAs can use article 7 of the GPDO to agree a "longer period", and concludes that the below "Warren Farm" High Court judgment dated 31/07/2019 should not be followed, please view this post.]

Introduction:

The following High Court judgment relating to article 7 of the GPDO (i.e. the provision to agree a "longer period" for an application for prior approval) was handed down on 31/07/2019: Continue reading →