The "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document has been updated to include 6 additional appeal decisions relating to householder permitted development legislation, for which the conclusions are as follows:
October 2020 - Code a01229 (appeal dismissed):
- Where part of an extension extends beyond an original side wall, then the restrictions of A.1(j) apply to the entire extension (i.e. not only to that part of the extension that extends beyond the original side wall). (*)
- For example, where part of an extension extends beyond an original side wall, then the overall width of the (entire) extension can not be “greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse”, even if the part of the extension that extends beyond the original side wall does not do so by more than half the width of the house. (*)
October 2020 - Code a01228 (appeal dismissed):
- This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that a particular piece of land is not within the “curtilage” of the property.
[Note: The land is approx 5m-19m from the main house and separated from the main house by a wall].
October 2020 - Code a01227 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
October 2020 - Code a01226 (appeal allowed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
October 2020 - Code a01225 (appeal dismissed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
September 2020 - Code a01224 (appeal allowed):
- [Note: To view these conclusions, please log onto the website as a member].
Notes:
- To view the conclusions, summaries, and decision notices for any of the above appeals, please view the "GPDO Part 1 (All Classes) - LDC Appeal Decisions" document. As a member of the Planning Jungle website, you can view the decision notices for all of the appeals on the website for no extra cost.
- Any of the above conclusions marked with a "(*)" contradict other appeal decisions. The "Reference Section" within the above document indicates how many appeals have supported and contradicted each particular conclusion.